Skip to content

The Sun on Earth

August 15, 2012
tags: ,
by

Cadarache:In the dusty highlands of Provence in southern France, workers have excavated a vast rectangular pit 17 metres down into the unforgiving rocks. From my raised vantage point, I can see bright yellow mechanical diggers and trucks buzzing busily around the edge of the pit, toy-like in the huge construction site. Above us, the fireball Sun dries the air at an unrelenting 37°C.

Diggers excavate the construction site

These are embryonic stages to what is perhaps humankind’s most ambitious project: to replicate the Sun here on Earth.

When construction is complete, the pit will host a 73-metre-high machine that will attempt to create boundless energy by the atomic fusion of hydrogen nuclei, in much the same way as stars like our Sun do. Fusion is the holy grail of energy sources – physicists have dreamed of being able to produce cheap, safe, plentiful energy in this way since the 1950s. But the dream has always remained “30 years away” from realisation.

The site is well above the flood plain in the hills of Provence

The need for a new energy source has never been more pressing. Global energy demand is expected to double by 2050, while the share coming from fossil fuels – currently 85% – needs to drop dramatically if we are to reduce carbon emissions and limit global warming.

Fusion, many believe, could be the answer. It works by reacting together two types, or isotopes, of hydrogen at such high temperature that the positively charged atoms are able to overcome their mutual repulsion and fuse together. The result of this fusion is an atom of helium plus a highly energetic neutron particle. Physicists aim to capture the energy from the emitted neutrons and use it to drive steam turbines to produce electricity.

When the reaction occurs in the core of the Sun, the giant ball of gas applies a strong gravitational pressure that helps force the hydrogen nuclei together. Nevertheless, the Sun’s core temperature is around 10 million°C. Here on Earth, the fusion reaction will take place at a tiny fraction of the scale of the Sun, without the benefit of its gravity. So the engineers need to build the reactor to withstand temperatures at least ten times that of the Sun – hundreds of millions of degrees.

It’s just one of the huge number of challenges facing the designers of this groundbreaking project. The concept was discussed and argued over for several decades before finally being agreed in 2007 as a multinational cooperation between the European Union, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the US – in total, 34 countries representing more than half of the world’s population. Since then, the 5 billion euro budget has trebled, the scale of the reactor has been halved, the completion date has been pushed back and the project, called Iter (meaning ‘the way’ in Latin), has somewhat lost its shine.

At the Tore Supra tokamak in the nuclear facility next-door to Iter

But despite the difficulties, progress is being made. The parts are being manufactured and tested by the participating nations, many of whom hope to develop the expertise to compete in the new international fusion energy market, which is anticipated to follow a successful outcome at Iter.

Since they don’t have access to the special conditions available in the Sun, physicists have designed a donut shaped reaction chamber, called a tokamak, in which the high-temperature hydrogen plasma is held in place for fusion but held away from the reactor walls which could not withstand the heat. The tokamak deploys a powerful magnetic field to suspend and compress the hydrogen plasma using an electromagnet made of superconducting coils of a niobium tin alloy.

A cross-section through the niobium superconducting coils that will make up the electromagnet

Once the reaction is initiated, the heat produced by the atomic fusion will contribute to keep the core hot. But unlike a fission reaction that takes place in nuclear power stations and atomic bombs, the fusion reaction is not self perpetuating. It requires a constant input of material or else it quickly fizzles out, making the reaction far safer. And unlike what you might have seen in a recent Batman movie, the chamber cannot be transformed into a nuclear bomb.

The walls of the tokamak will be coated in beryllium to withstand the harsh temperatures, but the divertor, which channels the energetic neutrons out of the reactor, will also be actively cooled using liquid helium and cooling towers.

“Helium availability might turn out to be a limiting factor,” Iter’s deputy director Richard Hawryluk, tells me. “We know there is some in oil wells and natural gas deposit, but no one knows how much, so it will be extremely important to conserve what we have.” Helium will be produced by the fusion reaction, but only in very small quantities.

The Tore Supra is far smaller than Iter will be, and even though it’s in a secure nuclear facility, it only reacts a non-radioactive hydrogen isotope.

Because one of the hydrogen isotopes used, tritium, is radioactive (with a half-life of 12 years), the entire site must conform to France’s strict nuclear safety laws. And to complicate matters further, the site is also moderately seismically active, meaning that the buildings are being supported on rubber pads to protect them from earthquakes.

These issues, and the logistics of dealing with multiple nations with their own fluctuating domestic budget constrains, mean that the site won’t be ready for the first experiments until 2020. Even then, they will just be testing the reactor and its equipment. The first proper fusion tests, reacting deuterium (a hydrogen isotope abundant in sea water) and tritium (which will be made from lithium), won’t take place until 2028.

Those will be the key tests, though. If all goes to plan, the physicists hope to prove that they can produce ten times as much energy as the experiment requires. The plan is to use 50 megawatts (in heating the plasma and cooling the reactor), and get 500 MW out. Larger tokamaks should, theoretically, be able to deliver an even greater input to output power ratio, in the gigawatts.

The hydrogen is piped into the tokamak doughnut.

And that is the big gamble. So far, the world’s best and biggest tokamak, the JET experiment in the UK, hasn’t even managed to break even, energy-wise. Its best ever result, in 1997, achieved a 25 MW output with a 16 MW input. Scale is an extremely important factor for tokamaks, though. Iter will be twice the size of JET, as well as featuring a number of design improvements.

If Iter is successful in its proof of principle mission, the first demonstration fusion plants will be built, capable of actually using and storing the energy generated for electricity production. These plants are slated to begin operation in about 2040 – around 30 years away, in fact…

Despite the seductive promise of finally getting a supply of electricity that’s “too cheap to meter”, the long wait to readiness and the fact that the technology remains unproven, means that many politicians are hesitant or even hostile to the expensive project. Additionally, because fusion energy won’t be ready for decades, even if it works, other low-carbon energy sources must still be pursued in the short-term at least.

But if we do manage to replicate the Sun on Earth, the consequences would be spectacular. An era of genuinely cheap energy – both environmentally and financially, would have far reaching implications for everything from poverty reduction to conflict easement.

The next generation could be fusion powered – perhaps even within the lifetimes of the workman digging below me.

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. timeastor permalink
    August 15, 2012 2:30 pm

    * * *

    For many an hour I walked in the dunes
    My sojourn relentlessly long
    I thought of the power the stars could produce
    One day simple mortals among

    And, lifting my eyes to horizon anon
    I saw what no simile tells
    A halo was proudly embracing a Sun
    Arising from underground wells …

    Awaking from slumber, I shivered in cold,
    For night takes not heat from the stars
    And long there I sat, pre-divining the world
    Of what may befall us afar

  2. August 25, 2012 5:33 am

    Dear Ms. Gaia Vince,

    Reading over the “Iter” project made me realize that the search for more and more energy is perhaps the main dilema humankind faces….Once we have a little of something, we always seem to want a little more….Especially with the concept of Energy! Would it not be possible to live a “quality life” without greater amounts of energy…? Rather than strive to replicate the sun within our biosphere…maybe we should dedicate ourselves to using the Sun that is already bathing the biosphere in energy…? Harnessing the power of the Sun can already be done…! Its not a matter of quantity (more gigawatts), but in my humble opinion, its how to use the given amount already in our possession wisely…! I hope this make sense…?

    To help you understand my logic… I will close with a short, but “true story,” from my primary school teacher (3rd Grade), who taught me how to use the Sun in a very practical way….By taking advantage of the sunlight that was “already available”, and focusing it…. we designed and built a parabolic solar oven…! Using simple materials: cardboard, tin foil, and plastic….we cooked a hotdog is just a few minutes….! Some how I reminded of the saying: “Its not the quantity, but the quality.”

    Kind regards, and if you ever visit California…I would welcome your visit!

    Roger A. Haring, CCA / QAL / Project Coordinator

  3. November 30, 2012 10:07 am

    Hi,
    Prompted by Roger’s comment, and as an aside (perhaps), I know of a lady called Martine Augizeau who lives near Bordeaux and who produces and sells a range of truly excellent jams using solar ovens in her back garden. cf. http://www.ogizo.fr/
    While she insists that her solar ovens even work when there is no direct sunlight, I can think of some places where it might be prudent to at least place them under transparent umbrellas (n’est-ce pas, Cumbria?).
    Thank you also, Gaia, for the Beeb article – and shame on Apple, etc., for their eco-irresponsible ways.
    With best wishes,
    Trevor

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: