Skip to content

Moving mountains – and the creatures on them

June 8, 2011

London: Spin a globe and what land you see among the vast blue swirl of our planet is the consequence of millions of years of geological battle. Plate tectonics has created mountains and valleys, plains and rifts – the land on which we and our fellow terrestrial species must live.

Incredibly, we’ve only really understood this process for the past 50 years, and it’s during that time that we humans have been doing our own Earth-shaping. We are moving mountains through mining and other extractions, for example, and global warming (owing to the carbon we’re releasing from fossil fuels) is causing low-lying islands and coasts to drown under sea level rise. Global warming is having a truly global impact: melting of ice in Antarctica and Greenland is squashing the planet – the Earth is less round because of us.

The Panama Canal is being widened

Plate tectonics has a big effect on life on Earth. As islands emerge through volcanic eruptions or other uplift, land becomes available for animals and plants to colonise, and over millions of years, they evolve distinct characteristics – they become new species. They same thing happens if populations become separated from each other through other land separations, for example, when plate tectonics engineered the split of Africa from Antarctica, or when South America split from Antarctica.

The tapir used to be the biggest animal in South America

On a rare occasion, the opposite happens. When the continents of South and North America crashed into each other, their separate ecosystems also interacted. Species that had evolved in isolation from each other suddenly had to compete and it can’t have been pretty. We have evidence of the battle in the fossil record of extinctions and spreading habitats.

Researchers digging for clues at the continental crash site

When we were in Panama, we visited some of the palaeontology digs in this vital corridorbetween the two continents with Carlos Jaramillo, a geologist at STRI. Carlos showed us some of his extraordinary discoveries, including ‘Titanoboa’ (the world’s largest snake) and some teeny tiny horses just 20 centimetres high.

Sloths were able to cross to North America when the seaway closed

Carlos is reexamining the date of the continental collision – the date for the closure of the Great Central American Seaway – and he’s found evidence that they may have crashed into each other nearly 20 million years earlier than we thought. The new date is not only interesting for geologists, it has repercussions for climate predictions. I wrote about it in New Scientist this week.

South and North America either joined 3 million years ago - or 22 million yrs ago

Around a century ago, we humans re-split the continents when we built the Panama canal. In perhaps the first example of a major engineering project assessing an environmental impacts assessment, the US government asked scientists from the Smithsonian Institute to investigate what might happen if the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans were reconnected. The environmentalists were concerned that merging species that had been separated for millions of years, from corals to fish, would lead to extinctions and ecosystem collapse.

In order to prevent this, the canal steps up in elevation from each coast to a central lake. Freshwater flows from the lake down the canal to the oceans. Despite these efforts, there is still some species transfer, even if it is far less than it might have been.

Invasive species have even made it to the Galapagos

Recently, humans have outdone plate tectonics on the species-mixing and extinction front. We’ve introduced animals and plants to almost every one of the planet’s ecosystem from the Galapagos (as I described in an article in Science) to Antarctica. Invasive species are now so widespread that ecologists are changing tack on their conservation strategy. They are beginning to look anew at these hybrid, or ‘novel’, biomes to see what value they bring to the ecosystem. A group of 18 ecologists have written a commentary in Nature this week explaining this shift in direction.

Advertisements
One Comment leave one →
  1. Eva Aguilar permalink
    June 30, 2011 6:41 pm

    Dear Gaia:

    I´m a panamanian woman living in Manchester, United Kingdom. My husband has the good habit to buy the New Scientist every week and a few weeks ago he came from the newstand with great news: there was an article about Panama in the magazine. As a science journalist myself I´ve been following the subject of the raise of the isthmus for many years. But since I´m very far from home now, I´ve been kind of disconected. Your article, however, has been an amazing update about what the researchers are finding in the area of the Canal. I have read it several times, really enjoyed it. And I can´t wait to ask Carlos Jaramillo if he thinks that, by contradicting the long respected theory of Antony Coates, he, as Darwin, is about to “kill God”.

    Best,
    Eva Aguilar-

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: